<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quotation of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/26/quotation-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/26/quotation-of-the-day/</link>
	<description>Gently, but with undeniable will...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: guess</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/26/quotation-of-the-day/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>guess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=212#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>gary - no. i remember once pointing out to you on the old pulp list that abusers often say they're sorry. they abuse the other, then they say they're sorry, do all kinds of stuff to 'prove it' and then abuse the other person again. if i were going to get object relations freudian theory on it, i'd say that people who perform that sort of an apology are mired in guilt -- but not shame. 

i posted an excerpt about it once, http://blog.pulpculture.org/2005/11/01/its-a-shame/

not that anyone is an abuser in any of this, but that, according to freudian theory, extreme cases illuminate what all of us go through on a less extreme level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gary - no. i remember once pointing out to you on the old pulp list that abusers often say they&#8217;re sorry. they abuse the other, then they say they&#8217;re sorry, do all kinds of stuff to &#8216;prove it&#8217; and then abuse the other person again. if i were going to get object relations freudian theory on it, i&#8217;d say that people who perform that sort of an apology are mired in guilt &#8212; but not shame. </p>
<p>i posted an excerpt about it once, <a href="http://blog.pulpculture.org/2005/11/01/its-a-shame/" >http://blog.pulpculture.org/2005/11/01/its-a-shame/</a></p>
<p>not that anyone is an abuser in any of this, but that, according to freudian theory, extreme cases illuminate what all of us go through on a less extreme level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/26/quotation-of-the-day/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=212#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>I agree that an authentic apology is an authentic recognition of the other, but I question whether one can be a revision of a past circumstance. Rather it is a recognition of a past circumstance coupled with authentic remorse. Implicit in that remorse should be the promise to not revisit the past circumstance. 

And we really do need to hook up. As soon as I get my shit together, we need to make plans to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that an authentic apology is an authentic recognition of the other, but I question whether one can be a revision of a past circumstance. Rather it is a recognition of a past circumstance coupled with authentic remorse. Implicit in that remorse should be the promise to not revisit the past circumstance. </p>
<p>And we really do need to hook up. As soon as I get my shit together, we need to make plans to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/26/quotation-of-the-day/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=212#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>isn't an authentic apology an authentic recognition of the other?  if we mean what we say an apology is an explicit YES, not a new promise but a revision of a past circumstance.

RE
VISE

and CONsent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t an authentic apology an authentic recognition of the other?  if we mean what we say an apology is an explicit YES, not a new promise but a revision of a past circumstance.</p>
<p>RE<br />
VISE</p>
<p>and CONsent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
