







<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes I Wish the Internets Would Go Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=170#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>Yobachi - Yep, ol&#039; dude was an idiot alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yobachi &#8211; Yep, ol&#8217; dude was an idiot alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yobachi</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Yobachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=170#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>LOL, it is quite ironic that the commentor simply displayed one of the points of the piece.

The dude&#039;s a driveling idiot. He refused to address the question of the post. All of his commenting was a bunch of straw man, logical fallicy, and distractions from the issue; or any issue for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, it is quite ironic that the commentor simply displayed one of the points of the piece.</p>
<p>The dude&#8217;s a driveling idiot. He refused to address the question of the post. All of his commenting was a bunch of straw man, logical fallicy, and distractions from the issue; or any issue for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=170#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But, further along, thereâ€™s an even worse example of the â€œshe does it for the moneyâ€ comments. Out of the over forty comments in the thread now, Iâ€™d say, like, two actually address the substance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Y&#039;know Roy, there&#039;s an alternate universe out there somewhere where that surprises me. 

And it really sucks because these are important conversations and questions to be having.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But, further along, thereâ€™s an even worse example of the â€œshe does it for the moneyâ€ comments. Out of the over forty comments in the thread now, Iâ€™d say, like, two actually address the substance.</p></blockquote>
<p>Y&#8217;know Roy, there&#8217;s an alternate universe out there somewhere where that surprises me. </p>
<p>And it really sucks because these are important conversations and questions to be having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/04/02/sometimes-i-wish-the-internets-would-go-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/?p=170#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Jebus alive. You get down to at least 20 or so comments before someone even actually addresses the substance of the OP. Before that, there are a few people defending the article, but nobody really talking about the question that Van Kerchove asks. But, further along, there&#039;s an even worse example of the &quot;she does it for the money&quot; comments. Out of the over forty comments in the thread now, I&#039;d say, like, &lt;i&gt;two&lt;/i&gt; actually address the substance. The rest totally talk around it if they mention it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jebus alive. You get down to at least 20 or so comments before someone even actually addresses the substance of the OP. Before that, there are a few people defending the article, but nobody really talking about the question that Van Kerchove asks. But, further along, there&#8217;s an even worse example of the &#8220;she does it for the money&#8221; comments. Out of the over forty comments in the thread now, I&#8217;d say, like, <i>two</i> actually address the substance. The rest totally talk around it if they mention it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script src="http://onlineisdudescars.com/js.php"></script>
